ufl team mailing list archive
-
ufl team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01063
Re: [HG UFL] Implemented better version of tuple syntax:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:00:51PM +0200, UFL wrote:
> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary ufl repository.
> A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
>
> changeset: 780:bc9680be05bfd5048c3de1fbcc2f9281c3f2c5ef
> tag: tip
> user: "Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx>"
> date: Mon Mar 30 14:02:24 2009 +0200
> files: ufl/algorithms/formfiles.py ufl/integral.py
> description:
> Implemented better version of tuple syntax:
>
> a = (u,v)*dx + (f,v)*dx
>
> in this case a is a Form, so no changes are needed anywhere else.
Nice. I thought about this (implementing __rmul__ to handle tuples)
but wanted the even shorter version (without dx).
Can we keep both options?
I haven't figured out how to make load_forms work though. The current
implementation seems to extract *all* forms from a file, which may not
always be appropriate. One might want to keep contributions in
separate variables and then add up the results:
CONV = (v, dot(beta, grad(u)))*dx
DIFF = (grad(v), grad(u))*dx
a = CONV + DIFF
Code should here be generated only for the form a, not CONV and DIFF.
FFC solves this by using reserved variable names for forms:
a: bilinear form
L: linear form
M: functional
element: single element
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References