On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:05:29PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:58:32PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
Marie Rognes wrote:
Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
This is something we've discussed before, but I want to discuss it
again.
Could we change the definition of the gradient of a vector to be the
"normal" definition:
grad(u) = du_i / dx_j
?
I think this sounds like an excellent idea.
Me too.
Cowards! ;) You wait for Martin the leave and then jump on the
bandwagon.
I suggested this March/April, and Martin's argument against was for
consistency with other operations. I think that it's fine to change so
long that other operations do not break or lead to
unexpected/inconsistent results.
:-)
I've had this discussion with Martin at least twice and both times he
managed to convince me of his definition. But I keep forgetting the
arguments in favor of the current definition (and more so when it
gets me into trouble).
I've created a blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ufl/+spec/redine-grad
Add your comments there. (Harish, add comments on div.)