ufl team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:53:03PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>
>
> On 16. mai 2011, at 13:07, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The suggested plan is as follows:
> >
> > 1. Release 0.9.11    now
> > 2. Release 0.9.12    2011-05-31
> > 3. Release 1.0.0-rc1 2011-06-14
> >
> > No new features should be added after this point and all known
> > bugs (unless we decide to push them to post 1.0) should have
> > been fixed.
> >
> > 4. Release rc2, rc3, ... if necessary
> > 5. Release 1.0.0 when ready
> >
> > Between 3 and 4, all depending packages (like cbc.solve etc) have a
> > chance to make updates to any interface changes and everyone is
> > encouraged to test the release candidate.
> >
>
> Sounds good to me, though "when ready" is not a very definite term.

Def: when we have fixed all bugs found during a testing window of
length to be determined below...

> > How long should this window be? I'd like a very short window (like a
> > week). Opinions?
>
> A week is fine as long as one knows approximately when this week is going to be :-)

At the release of 1.0.0-rc1 scheduled for 2011-06-14.

--
Anders