ugr-testing team mailing list archive

[aishen <aishen@xxxxxxx>]

Yes true ?
I would prefer have a ubuntu classic as choice more than unity. Unity is
ubuntu : I think is life cycle will be very short no use to learn how to
use it !
I tried to install many times ugr but each time I had to come back to
ubuntu classic. I think it's the same as with kde4, at beginning, it was
not very stable, but now it's good thing (though i prefer gnome :
quicker and themes are really good) it's a matter of test I use both.
At the moment ubuntu classic with gnome 2.32 works very fine I could
even get back emerald so i am very happy with it. I would like to test
gnome-3 more but I think it's too unstable on ubuntu at the moment.
Normal they did it on purpose

Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 03:08 +0000, Chris Gummin a écrit :
> Public bug reported:
> 
> The idea of UGR was to have Ubuntu with Gnome 3 INSTEAD OF Unity. Why
> are we adding a session option for Unity?
> 
> ** Affects: ugr-session-unity
>      Importance: Undecided
>          Status: New
> 
> -- 
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> GNOME Remix: Testing Team, which is subscribed to UGR (Ubuntu Gnome
> Remix) Project.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776867
> 
> Title:
>   Unity option defeats UGR's purpose
> 
> Status in UGR unity session option:
>   New
> 
> Bug description:
>   The idea of UGR was to have Ubuntu with Gnome 3 INSTEAD OF Unity. Why
>   are we adding a session option for Unity?
>