unity-design team mailing list archive

[Scott Kitterman <ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

zekopeko <zekopeko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas <mpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Kévin PEIGNOT wrote on 04/09/11 13:04:
>>>
>>> I don't agree. PPA should be used only to install unstable /
>>> unsupported features. I think the problem is that a lot of very good
>>> programs aren't in the default repository and need to be installed
>via
>>> PPA.
>>>
>>> PPA installation shouldn't be too easy for newbies, because it can
>be
>>> risky for their system, even if they don't realize that.
>>>...
>>
>> The Ubuntu Developer site is now just about ready to solve the
>problem
>> of good programs not being in the default repository.
>> <https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/>
>>
>> So now is a good time to think about how we can make Ubuntu safer by
>> making adding PPAs harder.
>>
>> - --
>> mpt
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAk5krAsACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecog+wCeNJ0yZCexGxSR0vYG9z4ObEC0
>> OsoAmwYmLbOS7pX6oYAAW4w9oYyDhvHF
>> =E114
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>This is offtopic but the post-release process only solves part of the
>problem I tried to explain. If I'm reading PostReleaseApps[1] page
>correctly it would still mean that, as per example on the wiki,
>PyJunior would be locked only to version 1.0 while there might be 1.2
>out.
>
>To completely kill PPAs as means to upgrading applications there needs
>to be an upgrade mechanism for already existing apps beyond simple
>bugfixes. It would also increase overall stability/security since a
>developer is more likely to support a newer version (especially
>considering how fast the FOSS ecosystem moves).

This is what backports is for.

Scott K