unity-design team mailing list archive

[Pedro Bessa <pedbessa@xxxxxxxxx>]

Em 04-05-2012 01:10, Mark Shuttleworth escreveu:
> Hi folks
>
> We've done rather well to attract a lot of comments and discussion on
> the unity-design list, which is great. And there are lots of interesting
> ideas and suggestions and proposals and mockups, which is even better.
>
> There are, however, quite a lot of repetitive threads. For example,
> today's "yet another dodge windows" thread. Into that category I'd put
> the "why can't it be an option" thread and the "it's ridiculous that the
> buttons are on the left" thread. For all that they represent perfectly
> valid ideas, which are certainly shared by some users, they have been
> discussed to death and are boring to re-hash again and again. They clog
> an inbox that would otherwise be full of more interesting, new ideas. We
> are over them, so to speak, but new participants may not know that.
>
> There's lots of value in having a public, unmoderated list for design
> discussions. It's good to have a place where anybody can generate ideas.
> And this list is fine for that. I'd like to propose an additional list,
> unity-distilled, which would be public and unmoderated, but open by
> invitation only. Participation there would be predicated on a shared
> understanding of our values, goals and modus operandi. People would be
> invited if they show an interest, insight into and agreement with the
> answers to the above boring threads, and several more like them. I'm
> sure we'll have vigorous debates on -distilled, but folk there would
> have demonstrated an ability to have the debate, settle the question and
> move on to more interesting matters rather than letting the same topics
> come up repeatedly.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Mark
ok ok you're angry, but don't make the list real

Napoleon invaded Russia and his troops died of cold.
Hitler invaded Russia too and his troops did of cold too.

Isn't it amazing that errors are in the past?
I think we should use them to create a better future.
History teachers argue this and this and this are
errors from the past.

If you think arguments from the past get better, just
because time passes and call the list a synonym of
filtered, just because you think the rest is dirt, you
will be placing the history teachers in a second class
mailing list like your country used to like to do with
the blacks and call the arguments of history teachers
dirt.

So it's just as I said: don't make the list real.