widelands-dev team mailing list archive

[Nasenbaer <916545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I assigned it to Widelands Developers, as this is a major rewrite which
more than one person is working on.

Currently I started with the refactoring of the current internet gaming
implementation, to ease the implementation of a new one. First changes
will hopefully be ready soon.

Should we open a new branch for this purpose, or better keep this in
main trunk to directly force our playtesters to use the new
implementation once it is in testing stage? ;)

As my next changes won't break ggz implementation I would vote for main
trunk. What do YOU think?

** Changed in: widelands
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Widelands Developers (widelands-dev)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Widelands
Developers, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916545

Title:
  About depending on GGZ packages

Status in Widelands:
  Confirmed
Status in “widelands” package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  I noticed a bug report in Debian which basically suggests to drop the
  GGZ packages because it is unmaintained upstreams. Since Widelands
  depends on ggz, this of course affects us there (not to mention Debian
  derivaties like Ubuntu and Linux Mint).

  I know the ggz dependency has been discussed a bit before, but we
  should probably figure out what the long-term plan is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/widelands/+bug/916545/+subscriptions