widelands-dev team mailing list archive

[Hans Joachim Desserud <916545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am not sure how feasible this is, so feel free to ignore my comment.

That said, it would be nice if a test suite was added at the same time
as the reimplementation so that we could make sure it was working and
spot regressions. From remember from previous discussion, the current
test coverage is fairly low, so it would be nice to cover a new (and not
to mention rather important) section. Depending on whether we want the
same behaviour as the current one it could also be used to to check that
the new implementation is working according to what we want. Though if
too much is changed anyways the latter is of course not relevant.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Widelands
Developers, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916545

Title:
  About depending on GGZ packages

Status in Widelands:
  Confirmed
Status in “widelands” package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  I noticed a bug report in Debian which basically suggests to drop the
  GGZ packages because it is unmaintained upstreams. Since Widelands
  depends on ggz, this of course affects us there (not to mention Debian
  derivaties like Ubuntu and Linux Mint).

  I know the ggz dependency has been discussed a bit before, but we
  should probably figure out what the long-term plan is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/widelands/+bug/916545/+subscriptions