widelands-dev team mailing list archive
-
widelands-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00953
Re: [Merge] lp:~hjd/widelands/warnings into lp:widelands
Yes, they will be used by default, of course assuming the compiler supports them.
For instance, take the string "-Wlogical-op -Wsync-nand -Wtrampolines". If you check this against a compiler which doesn't support -Wlogical-op, the check will fail so none of the options are added. This happens even if the compiler might have supported the other two.
So this division is mainly done so that we have a minium baseline ("-Wall -Wextra") which is guaranteed to be there, and potentially an extended set of warnings if your compiler supports all of them.
Ideally we would have some nice way to check the indiviual options and apply the only supported ones. But until we have that, I have split them into categories so that a single unsupported option will not be able to disable the baseline warnings. I don't like the thought of developers which see no warnings at all in the code they write because they happen to have an older compiler which doesn't support one of the additional options.
In other words, we take the baseline warnings which should always be there, add some extra warnings if all are recognized, and add a few more if the compiler is GCC (or strictly speaking, supports these GCC-only options).
I also mentioned this briefly in the previous merge https://code.launchpad.net/~hjd/widelands/compilation-warnings/+merge/141946
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~hjd/widelands/warnings/+merge/145089
Your team Widelands Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~hjd/widelands/warnings into lp:widelands.
References