Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Janek Kozicki a écrit : > Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:10:51 +0200) > > >> I just asked Andrea, a new user, what he thinks about the following >> names : State, Engine, and PhysicalAction. For him, those names are ok >> > > the names are always OK, until you start to check what the class is > doing. And then you discover that you were expecting something > totally different. Andrea doesn't know what those classes are doing, > so any random name is OK for him. The best/worst example is PhysicalAction > > In fact I told him what PhysicalAction is for : forces and moments on bodies, or any other physical action. In THIS case Olivier picked a good name IMO ;-). But if you really want to rename it to something like ResultantAction I won't complain to much. Bruno -- _______________ Chareyre Bruno Maitre de conference Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble Laboratoire 3S (Soils Solids Structures) - bureau I08 BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France Tél : 04.56.52.86.21 ________________ _______________________________________________ yade-dev mailing list yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-dev
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |