Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Václav Šmilauer said: (by the date of Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:41:07 +0200) > > Frederic wanted to introduce prefix "Yade" for few classes that stay > > on the top. It's the absolute TOP of yade. Those that WILL BE > > declared inside yade.cpp in int main(){}; > > It would make more sense to have yade::Simulation, I think. Didn't you want > to put everything into yade namespace? ah, true. I forgot about namespaces. Thanks about reminding about that. But Bruno noted (and I fully agree), that simulation "is what happens when you click". So I still prefer yade::Model. And then, in fact.... maybe even yade::core::Model, so we can have yade::common::Something, etc ? > Yes, I know, you don't need to tell me for the 10th time that singletons are > bad and will be removed ;-) right, sorry. I should be less talking and more coding. Very bad for me, that the articles have priority, and when I come back to Poland I'll work much less on yade, because I'll need to look after kids, when my wife will be finishing her PhD. So in any case... expect all that stuff implemented starting from january 2008, when I sign another contract here in Grenoble. -- Janek Kozicki | _______________________________________________ yade-dev mailing list yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-dev
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |