yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00660
Re: Shop::unbalancedForce
> > I also hope that such generic interactions will reduce code duplication
> > (for instance, there is unbalancedForce computation in Triaxial, but now
> > it can use this function).
> >
> Very good. I get it you modified the class hierarchy, or NormalShearI
> has been here for a while and I didn't notice?
No, that is quite a recent addition, mainly because of SDECLinkPhysics
vs. other very similar classes; I also hope it will accelerate getting
rid of persistentInteractions and consolidate some other code.
> Agreed. Two main reasons for current situation :
> 1. I tried to comply with Yade design - in a stupid way maybe.
> 2. Global stiffness is (probably more "could" or "should", in fact...)
> also used to control the stress on walls. So the stiffness data is a bit
> more general than just timestep computing.
>
> One more reason to merge : if somebody makes the mistake of setting
> different intervals in counter and timestepper, it could result in a
> strange behaviour, perhaps uninitialized values, etc.
Go ahead with that, I think that will be much friendlier, indeed.
Vaclav
References