← Back to team overview

yade-dev team mailing list archive

Re: random-access container for interactions

 

> Please run some tests how does your container perform compared to
> containers we already have. If it is roughly on par with them, random
> access is a great bonus and I would be all for using only the new one.

According to my reasons and results, InteractionVecMap does not slow, 
and even a little faster than InteractionVecSet.

> How about
> physicalActionContainerResetter, that is normally run at the beginning
> of each iteration; don't you have problems there?

not sure that understood the question. 
There should be no problems, because physicalActionContainerResetter is performed in sequential mode...



-- 
Best regards, 
Sergei D. 	dorofeenko@xxxxxxxxx



Follow ups

References