yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not sure now...
If we take the unit cube as reference, will we be able to separate the 
real transformation and the part that is just a scaling of the cube to 
match the initial period size?
Another reason was perhaps to avoid doing the same multiplication again 
and again. But this code being done only once per iteration, such 
optimization might be futile.
No sure answer, sorry.

Bruno

Václav Šmilauer a écrit :
> Hi (Bruno), is there any good reason to have both refSize and trsf of
> the periodic cell? Why not just have unit cube and always transform it
> with Cell::trsf?
>
> (Not that I'm going to change it now, but I was just thinking if there
> was some reason behind, or if it is purely historical)
>
> v
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>   


--
_______________
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
Grenoble INP
Lab. 3SR
BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France
Tél : 33 4 56 52 86 21
Fax : 33 4 76 82 70 43
________________