yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, I do not know.

I usually compile yade with --prefix in local folder.
If something goes wrong with compilation - just fresh install. In most cases
it is faster, than to find out why is it so.
I understand, it is not a "devs"-way, but...
______________________________

Anton Gladkyy


2010/5/14 Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>

> Ok, I will try to implement it as well.
> Probably, you are right, I can use it not only for postprocessing purpose.
>
> Thank you.
> ______________________________
>
> Anton Gladkyy
>
>
> 2010/5/14 Václav Šmilauer <eudoxos@xxxxxxxx>
>
> > If we use a bitmask, FOREACH will pass through all bodies, checking,
>> > whether it will output to vtk-file or not.
>> > If I have 50000 bodies and 4 VTKRecorders, I will have 50000*4 = 200
>> > 000 iterations instead of 50 000.
>> I doubt you would even notice those empty loops. But keep it this way if
>> you want. If you assign mask, you can use it for other purposes as
>> well.
>> > Also we have a subscribedBodies algorithm in some other engines and
>> > this is a very clear.
>> Same for masks.
>> >  If we use mask instead, it will be a little bit
>> > complicated to understand, how it is working (even for me, several
>> > month later).
>> It is a very elegant solution, though, since you use each bit
>> separately. I would use mask myself in such kind of problem; it can be
>> added as well, if needed, though, no problem.
>>
>> > So, I prefer to stay this algorithm, even it is a little ugly.
>> As said, no problem.
>>
>> Cheers, v.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
>> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>