yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04421
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
I agree, mask is better.
r2229
Thank you
______________________________
Anton Gladkyy
2010/5/14 Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sorry, I do not know.
>
> I usually compile yade with --prefix in local folder.
> If something goes wrong with compilation - just fresh install. In most
> cases it is faster, than to find out why is it so.
> I understand, it is not a "devs"-way, but...
> ______________________________
>
> Anton Gladkyy
>
>
> 2010/5/14 Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Ok, I will try to implement it as well.
>> Probably, you are right, I can use it not only for postprocessing purpose.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> ______________________________
>>
>> Anton Gladkyy
>>
>>
>> 2010/5/14 Václav Šmilauer <eudoxos@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> > If we use a bitmask, FOREACH will pass through all bodies, checking,
>>> > whether it will output to vtk-file or not.
>>> > If I have 50000 bodies and 4 VTKRecorders, I will have 50000*4 = 200
>>> > 000 iterations instead of 50 000.
>>> I doubt you would even notice those empty loops. But keep it this way if
>>> you want. If you assign mask, you can use it for other purposes as
>>> well.
>>> > Also we have a subscribedBodies algorithm in some other engines and
>>> > this is a very clear.
>>> Same for masks.
>>> > If we use mask instead, it will be a little bit
>>> > complicated to understand, how it is working (even for me, several
>>> > month later).
>>> It is a very elegant solution, though, since you use each bit
>>> separately. I would use mask myself in such kind of problem; it can be
>>> added as well, if needed, though, no problem.
>>>
>>> > So, I prefer to stay this algorithm, even it is a little ugly.
>>> As said, no problem.
>>>
>>> Cheers, v.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
>>> Post to : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>
>>
>
References
-
[Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: noreply, 2010-05-13
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Anton Gladky, 2010-05-13
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-05-13
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Anton Gladky, 2010-05-13
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-05-13
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Anton Gladky, 2010-05-13
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Anton Gladky, 2010-05-14
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-05-14
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Anton Gladky, 2010-05-14
-
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2221: subscribedBodies parameter is added to VTKRecorder
From: Anton Gladky, 2010-05-14