yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why the hell am I not able to find such obvious trick?... Thank you. :)
For wm3, I though we were already in the process of dropping it and I'm 
opposed to nothing. Just, breaking clumps would be a pitty.
Today, however I'm inclined to think keeping both wm3 and eigen could be 
a good thing, as we have perhaps side effects which are difficult to 
detect (see next bug report I will fill with results I get comparing 
ScGeom and Dem3Dof, in a few hours probably).

-- 
r2247 broke compilation with wm3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.

Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine: New

Bug description:
Please fix that if you want to continue using wm3 or say clearly that we can drop wm3 now (I am fine with that).

pkg/dem/DataClass/InteractionGeometry/Dem3DofGeom_SphereSphere.cpp: In member function 'virtual Vector3r Dem3DofGeom_SphereSphere::scaleDisplacementT(Real)':
pkg/dem/DataClass/InteractionGeometry/Dem3DofGeom_SphereSphere.cpp:89:11: error: no match for 'operator*' in '2 * diff'
pkg/dem/DataClass/InteractionGeometry/Dem3DofGeom_SphereSphere.cpp:90:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function


pkg/dem/DataClass/InteractionGeometry/Dem3DofGeom_WallSphere.cpp: In member function 'virtual Vector3r Dem3DofGeom_WallSphere::scaleDisplacementT(Real)':
pkg/dem/DataClass/InteractionGeometry/Dem3DofGeom_WallSphere.cpp:46:11: error: no match for 'operator*' in '2 * diff'
pkg/dem/DataClass/InteractionGeometry/Dem3DofGeom_WallSphere.cpp:47:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function