yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Vincent Richefeu <richefeu@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I personally use voro++. I think it is more appropriate (simple) if you only need the cells with circumcenter-vertices (instead of particle-center-vertices). In voro++ there is not iterator to loop over edges, faces or something else. Instead, you need to know the internal structure. 

The voronoicell_base class is a template class with neighbor_track option. Nevertheless, I think (not sure) that only connectivity informations are stored but nothing about tetrahedrons.

Vincent
 

Le 29 oct. 2010 à 17:18, Bruno Chareyre a écrit :

> Thanks for suggestion Vaclav. I've been looking a little, but it needs more time to understand how to use it. Fluid coupling needs iterations on tetrahedra of the triangulation, and they don't seem to be explicitely defined in Voro++.
> Sergei, why "faster"? Did you compare CPU times with CGAL?
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> I stumbled accross http://math.lbl.gov/voro++/examples/radical/ (what
>>> they call "radical" is what you call "weighted"). Perhaps it could be
>>> useful for Ema with the periodic tringulation which CGAL does not
>>> handle. Note that the code was produced for analyzing particle flows
>>> (with LAMMMS).
>>> 
>>> Cheers, Vaclav
>> 
>> Hm, I use this lib too (though, at the moment without a periodicity and weights). It is very good: simple and fast (as opposed to CGAL)...
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> _______________
> Bruno Chareyre
> Associate Professor
> ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
> Lab. 3SR
> BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France
> Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
> Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43
> ________________
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp