yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06385
[Bug 493102] Re: NormalShearInteraction::{normalForce, shearForce} has undefined orientation
Marking wontfix as no-one cares enough to put some work in it.
** Changed in: yade
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
NormalShearInteraction::{normalForce,shearForce} has undefined orientation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493102
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is the registrant for Yade.
Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine: Won't Fix
Bug description:
NormalShearInteraction::{normalForce,shearForce} should contain forces on the interaction, which can be used for various purposes by other functions. However, different functors use them with different sign
ef2_Spheres_Elastic_ElasticLaw (a.k.a. ElasticContactLaw):
applyForceAtContactPoint(-currentContactPhysics->normalForce-shearForce, ... )
Law2_Dem3DofGeom_CpmPhys_Cpm:
applyForceAtContactPoint(BC->normalForce+BC->shearForce, ...)
This is a convention issue, but must be fixed. Should normalForce and shearForce be oriented as it applies on id1 (first case) or id2 (second case)? 2nd case is nicer WRT applyForceAtContactPoint syntax, but that one is arbitrary as well.
References