yade-dev team mailing list archive

["Sergei D." <sj2001@xxxxxxxxx>]

> 1. I would suggest that QuadroFactor is renamed to something that is 
> english (BoxFactory, for instance?), and that we don't use 
> center/extents for boxes anymore, it is plain frustrating (see 
> facetBox, that is just horrible; why not 2 corner points? Much easier, 
> maybe just for me?).
QuadroFactory can be a 3D rectangular box, a 2D rectangle region or a 1D 
line depending on extents non zero dimensions. So, extents is more 
usefull than corner points (and no frustration for me at least). And, 
Box is not quite correct name, I think (but I don't really like Quadro 
name too)..
> 2. The SpheresFactor::pickRandomPosition should not ask to report bug 
> directly... It could also suggest that SpheresFactory was used in the 
> script, but that it is an abstract class and that a derived class 
> should be used instead. (Unfortunately, because we used pointer 
> hierarchy and serializaiton, and the macros etc, it would be very 
> difficult to have real abstract classes, which would not be 
> instantiable from python; although perhaps doable).
ok

> 3. Perhaps you could put NozzleFactory to py/system.py in _deprecated, 
> so that people with old script know that they should replace it with 
> something else. OTOH it is true that it was perhaps not much used, dunno.
I think, it was not used, but I can add it to _deprecated. no problem.

> 4. As a suggestion, instead of CircularFactory, we could perhaps have 
> PolygonFactory (that is what edem uses, regular polygon specified by 
> number of vertices and radius). it is  more flexible, and not much 
> more complicated perhaps, no?
I don't know. Is it really usefull to have a polygon instead of a 
circle? If yes it can be added to BluePrints or required features, I think.

--

--
Best regards,
Sergei D.