yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #10634
[Bug 1300167] Re: (Not) Defining velocities in UniaxialStrainer ?
Hi,
I committed finally some change [1], that I began before your
assignment, Jan. For the examples script above, the results seem indeed
now identical (provided that NewtonIntegrator is put after
UniaxialStrainer in the list of engines of testUS.py).
Feel free to test/change it more, Jan. (for me I guess I will not use
much more this engine)
Jérôme
[1] :
https://github.com/yade/trunk/commit/50727a206bda1ff0129b391ef16daa5cc659ef3c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300167
Title:
(Not) Defining velocities in UniaxialStrainer ?
Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine:
New
Bug description:
Hi,
I have the feeling that there is something "wrong" with
UniaxialStrainer where the velocities of the "posIds" and "negIds"
bodies are not defined, and I illustrate it with following examples
(attached)
It deals with 2 contacting spheres, with an oblic contact. One sphere is moved towards the 2d sphere, and here both normal and tangential relative displacements occur.
- In testUS.py the moving sphere is moved through UniaxialStrainer
- Whereas in testUSb.py the movement comes from an initial value of velocity (and NewtonIntegrator)
And, obviously, the two simulations are different (see e.g. the plot
of fZ sustained by moving sphere). While I would tend to consider
these two simulations as identical.
What do you think ?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/1300167/+subscriptions
Follow ups
References