yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Jérôme Duriez <jerome.duriez@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, thank you.

For the DEM-PFV check I thought the minus sign was the big difference. Now I'm realizing it is normal : I did not see before that the test was on Qin + Qout, instead of Qin - Qout.
For the 1e-4 difference, I get for the same test the INFO message "More than 60\% of cpu time in FlowEngine ( 95.0429507 %)". I guess I compiled with some libraries disabled in cmake options. Could this be related with this slight discrepancy about flowrates ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1381282

Title:
  Sign convention in TriaxialStressController not consistent ?

Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,

  When used as stress or strain rates, sign convention of "goal1/2/3"
  attributes of TriaxialStressController engine seem to me as not
  consistent.

  Positive values for stress goals correspond indeed to compression, whereas positive values for goal strain rates involve extension.
  Which is itself not consistent with TriaxialStressController.strain variable (in the end, to obtain positive TriaxialStressController.strain, you need to set negative strain rates goal variables).

  Not difficult to fix, but maybe require a common decision. (I vote
  myself for geomechanics convention)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/1381282/+subscriptions