yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Raphaël Maurin <raphael.maurin@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all, 
I did a general documentation based on the answered I made in question https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/267566, however as I am not using the option based on the article of Pournin, I let this part as it was. The documentation was published in the last commit.
Checking the check files, I noticed something surprising in the check file of the law for the formulation of Pournin. In  the example script trunk/scripts/checks-and-tests/checks/checkViscElEng.py, it is checked that imposing a restitution coefficient of 0.7, we recover 0.736356797441 (!) Does anyone knows why it is like that ? It might be a problem for people using this law, who are in fact not imposing the restitution coefficient they want. 
Raphael

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460596

Title:
  Law2_ScGeom_ViscElPhys_Basic lacks minimal documentation

Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine:
  New

Bug description:
  Pointing to published paper is not enough, since I don't think any paper gives the law of Yade in its exact form.
  For the most complex aspects the doc could point to the approrpiate threads in the mailing list.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/1460596/+subscriptions