yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Bruno,

the idea is to drop deprecated (and duplicated) Qt4-code,
when it will be reasonable. If you think there are 14.04
users, then you are right, it is better to wait till 14.04 gets
EOL and then drop Qt4 from the code and declare Yade
as Qt5-only.

Regards

Anton


2017-11-30 16:36 GMT+01:00 Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> On 11/29/2017 07:31 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>>
>> The question is, how long does Yade want to support Ubuntu 14.04 LTS,
>> where QT5 version of libqglviewer does not exist. Another option is to
>> provide backport of libqglviewer-qt5-dev for Ubuntu 14.04, document it
>> as a mandatory package for Yade and drop Qt4 support completely.
>
> Hi Anton,
> I'm not sure I get all aspects of your question but I would tend to choose
> the energy-minimizing solution.
> For binary packages (I guess it is your main question) I don't think it is
> worth it to support 14.04 if it needs more efforts. Backporting
> libqglviewer, typically, is a waste of time since we are in the tail of
> 14.04. For the moment the 14.04 binary builds without problems, so let it
> be.
> If in the futur some changes become painful because of Qt4 we can just drop
> 14.04 support at that point.
> Would it be reasonable?
>
> In my mind, this is not really related to the resurected comment. I found
> the comment more useful for people _compiling_ on 14.04 (and possibly on
> other exotic distros, clusters, etc.) as a pointer to a potential source of
> trouble.
>
> Cheers
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp