← Back to team overview

yade-users team mailing list archive

Re: Box or facet


Works perfect!
String with utils.alignedFacetBox drops off a lot of my code and that's

But there is also a problem with "segmentation fault" in come cases.
[ENG] Best Regards
[GER] Mit freundlichen Grüßen
[RUS] С наилучшими пожеланиями
[UKR] З найкращими побажаннями

Anton Gladkyy

2009/6/25 Václav Šmilauer <eudoxos@xxxxxxxx>

> Anton Gladky píše v St 24. 06. 2009 v 10:27 +0200:
> > I would like to know what is the main difference between Box and Facet
> > geometry? And what is better and more reliable?
> > What is better interaction model Box-Sphere or Facet-Sphere?
> > I appreciate any comments.
> Boxes suck, sphere-box interaction is modeled as contact with fictive
> sphere. For anything that is beyond simple elasticity, use Facets. You
> can also make arbitrary triangulated surfaces with facets (especially
> with GTS which I am integrating right now), which is not possible with
> boxes.
> OTOH, Facets have no mass, therefore cannot be dynamic (they can move,
> but not as a result of impacts etc).
> Vaclav
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users>
> Post to     : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users>
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Follow ups