yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02295
R: Re: I: Re: Porosity
Thanks Bruno, now I understand.
Chiara
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da:
bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Data: 20/01/2010 9.47
>A: <yade-users@lists.
launchpad.net>
>Ogg: Re: [Yade-users] I: Re: Porosity
>
>
>> Question: which
value of friction angle do you use during the
>> compaction phase? Should be
the final one or should be lower than
>> that? Would it be possible to run the
analysis with a value equal to
>> zero?
>>
>Anything between 0 and the
final value. Higher than the final value
>would result in volumetric collapse
at the beginning of the test.
>
>> I would expect that also at a small level
of stress on the walls,
>> this value of unbalanced force remains quite low.
>unbF is non-dimensional, it is not affected by the level of stress. See
>it
as a percentage of the loading.
>
>> I suppose that the reason you (if it were
you) put the bool
>> isARadiusControlIteration relays in the concept of
maintaining a
>> quasi-static equilibrium as much as possible during the
analysis.
>I see the problem now.
>The point of cycling without expanding is
just to speed up the
>simulation. Increasing sizes need an iteration on all
bodies, and one on
>interactions. It is expensive. Increasing by 1e-5 at each
step is more
>or less like increasing by 1e-4 each 10 steps, so...
>
>Actually, unbF _should _be close to 1 during the begining of the growth,
>since most particles have 0 (unbF undefined) or 1 contact (unbF=1, since
>the
resultant force IS the contact force in this situation). The only
>time when
you really want it low is at the end of the compaction. I
>don't really care
if the compaction is dynamic in between, and for sure
>the interval between
growth is too small to let the sample really
>stabilize.
>> To make a summary
I see that the unbalanced force reaches low values
>> (say 0.07 or whatever)
only after having compressed the packing. Am I
>> escaping something?
>>
>>
>That is correct and expected. Gaz particles can't be at static
>equilibrium
under pressure, dense packings with many contacts can.
>
>Cheers.
>
>Bruno
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mailing list: https:
//launchpad.net/~yade-users
>Post to : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
>More help : https://help.
launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups