yade-users team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [Question #267566]: linear spring dashpot law?

To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Bruno Chareyre <question267566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:11:52 -0000
Reply-to: question267566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Question #267566 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/267566

Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
I would use the word "classical" very carefuly when it comes to contact laws.
I think the version we have in Yade is some of the most consistent around. It does not mean - of course - that it uses the only valid constitutive assumptions.
The one you mention is inconsistent: equation 5 is not objective.

Your question raises the fact that documentation is badly missing for Law2_ScGeom_ViscElPhys_Basic.
The information can only be found through the mailing list... I'm opening a bug.

Bruno

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.