← Back to team overview

yade-users team mailing list archive

Re: [Question #313433]: The nsteps and the computing time of Peri3dController

 

Question #313433 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/313433

    Status: Open => Answered

Jan Stránský proposed the following answer:
Hello,

have a look at Bruno's FEMxDEM link.

So I want to find an appropriate nSteps that can guarantee the result is
> relative steady


It strongly depends on the definition of "relative steady", material and
other factors. I think trial-and-error approach is the best one to find
such nSteps value

cheers
Jan


2016-08-01 6:08 GMT+02:00 liukeqi <question313433@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Question #313433 on Yade changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/313433
>
>     Status: Solved => Open
>
> liukeqi is still having a problem:
> Thanks Bruno. I knew the project of https://yade-
> dem.org/doc/FEMxDEM.html. But I want to couple YADE with another FEM
> software.  I mean that the memory occupation is more and more along with
> the times I called Peri3dController continuously in one *.py. Are there
> some method to release the memory occupation and guarantee the function
> strain=p3d.strain of Peri3dController available?
>
> --
> You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
> an answer contact for Yade.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> Post to     : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

-- 
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.