← Back to team overview

yade-users team mailing list archive

Re: [Question #630468]: CPMMat Stiffness formulation versus other cohesive laws

 

Question #630468 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/630468

Jan Stránský posted a new comment:
Hello,

as Manon said, CPM was designed for particles with the same radius
(because particles was just artificial discretization and not
representing physical grains). So if min is good or not was not actually
tested..

The main difference is that CPM assumes Aeq = pi*r*r, while
Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_FrictPhys (if I remember correctly) assumes
Aeq=r*r..

> However, since in this formulation the li~ equals Aeq over li, I am
right in assuming that the li distance corresponds to ri ?

yes

cheers
Jan

-- 
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.