yade-users team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [Question #670511]: Ambiguous dispatch : too much laws ?

To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Bruno Chareyre <question670511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:42:54 -0000
Reply-to: question670511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Question #670511 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/670511

    Status: Open => Answered

Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
I just realize this:
[...
Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_FrictPhys(),
Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_LubricationPhys(eta=m_viscosity,eps=m_roughness,label="Phys_Lub"),
...]

Which means: 
If b1 is frictMat and b2 is FrictMat then generate a FrictPhys AND If b1 is frictMat and b2 is FrictMat then generate a LubPhys.
You will have to decide, obviously. :)
You actually decide, by putting one first. Still there is logical error in this set of functors and it should not happen. Dispatching is order-independant only for consistent set of functors.

Bruno

-- 
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.