yade-users team mailing list archive

[Robert Caulk <question698303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #698303 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/698303

Robert Caulk proposed the following answer:
I don’t see the difference between scaling from 0.47 and 0.15 down to
0.015. Either way you are scaling around an order of magnitude.

That said, from a DEM perspective i am surprised your porosity is 0.47 for
a random dense packing that is compressed. I have no way of checking if you
are looking at porosity correctly because you did not share a script.

Cheers,

Robert

Le mar. 10 août 2021 à 11:52, ibraheem khan <
question698303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Question #698303 on Yade changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/698303
>
> ibraheem khan posted a new comment:
> my main concern is as real granite porosity is some what 0.015  and my
> DEM porosity is 0.4372 , so is it correct to scale heat capacity with
> this mush high porosity or can i get a low porosity for my DEM somewhat
> 0.15 0r 0.20
>
> --
> You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
> an answer contact for Yade.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> Post to     : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

-- 
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.