yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Armando Migliaccio <1239902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Is the rationale for changing the name just to 'conform' to other
openstack projects? Is there a rule that every openstack project need to
have an *-api component? This sounds more trouble than it's really
worth.

If we went down the road of breaking down the server in multiple
components (api + core plugins  + service plugins) then I can see that
and then calling the api component neutron-api seems obvious, but just
doing a rename for the sake of it seems rather pointless. But that's
just my opinion.

** Changed in: neutron
       Status: New => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239902

Title:
  neutron-server should be called neutron-api to conform with the rest
  of OpenStack

Status in devstack - openstack dev environments:
  New
Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service):
  Opinion

Bug description:
  The rest of OpenStack calls its api server *-api, so to make things
  more uniform neutron should rename neutron-server as neutron-api

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1239902/+subscriptions