yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Dolph Mathews <1338745@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It looks like swifts middleware could be moved to oslo, as there's
nothing swift-specific about it. There's nothing stopping you from
deploying that middleware in front of Keystone or swift, regardless of
whether it lives in oslo or swift.

** Description changed:

  Would be useful for keystone to support a healthcheck URL for
  consumption by load balancers.
  
  This middleware should provide the ability to manually disable the
  service via the existence of a file on the system's local disk.  This
  middleware should also perform a basic application functionality [1]
  check prior to reporting OK.
  
  Having this middleware would give us some flexibility around LB health
  checks we do not have today, and IMO would be beneficial.  This is
  fairly similar to what swift [2] is doing as well.
  
  [1] https://github.com/CiscoSystems/puppet-monit/blob/a459a7314ac4f0250ad8b9c6956a872b949840f1/files/healthcheck.py#L37
- [2] https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/0b594bc3afbffe942edebe9cdf02f60c06e627ab/swift/common/middleware/healthcheck.p
+ [2] https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/0b594bc3afbffe942edebe9cdf02f60c06e627ab/swift/common/middleware/healthcheck.py

** Changed in: keystone
       Status: New => Opinion

** Changed in: keystone
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to Keystone.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338745

Title:
  Add healthcheck middleware

Status in OpenStack Identity (Keystone):
  Opinion

Bug description:
  Would be useful for keystone to support a healthcheck URL for
  consumption by load balancers.

  This middleware should provide the ability to manually disable the
  service via the existence of a file on the system's local disk.  This
  middleware should also perform a basic application functionality [1]
  check prior to reporting OK.

  Having this middleware would give us some flexibility around LB health
  checks we do not have today, and IMO would be beneficial.  This is
  fairly similar to what swift [2] is doing as well.

  [1] https://github.com/CiscoSystems/puppet-monit/blob/a459a7314ac4f0250ad8b9c6956a872b949840f1/files/healthcheck.py#L37
  [2] https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/0b594bc3afbffe942edebe9cdf02f60c06e627ab/swift/common/middleware/healthcheck.py

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1338745/+subscriptions