yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Jeff Peeler <jpeeler@xxxxxxxxxx>]

For heat, this was merged in
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/heat/commit/?id=ea911b0210c4b4317de6bd371c25f5cb9c255655
and has already been released in j1.

** Changed in: heat
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306559

Title:
  Fix python26 compatibility for RFCSysLogHandler

Status in OpenStack Telemetry (Ceilometer):
  Triaged
Status in Cinder:
  Confirmed
Status in OpenStack Image Registry and Delivery Service (Glance):
  Confirmed
Status in Orchestration API (Heat):
  Fix Released
Status in OpenStack Identity (Keystone):
  Confirmed
Status in Murano:
  Fix Committed
Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service):
  Confirmed
Status in OpenStack Compute (Nova):
  Confirmed
Status in Oslo - a Library of Common OpenStack Code:
  Fix Released
Status in OpenStack Data Processing (Sahara, ex. Savanna):
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Currently used pattern https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63094/15/openstack/common/log.py (lines 471-479)  will fail for Python 2.6.x.
  In order to fix the broken Python 2.6.x compatibility, old style explicit superclass method calls should be used instead.

  Here is an example of how to check this for Python v2.7 and v2.6: 
  import logging.handlers
  print type(logging.handlers.SysLogHandler)
  print type(logging.Handler)

  Results would be:
  Python 2.7: <type 'type'>, so super() may be used for RFCSysLogHandler(logging.handlers.SysLogHandler)
  Python 2.6:<type 'classobj'>, so super() may *NOT* be used for RFCSysLogHandler(logging.handlers.SysLogHandler)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1306559/+subscriptions