yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #21312
[Bug 1272076] Re: VolumeNotCreated - Instance failed, cinder too slow
** Changed in: nova
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272076
Title:
VolumeNotCreated - Instance failed, cinder too slow
Status in Cinder:
New
Status in OpenStack Compute (Nova):
Invalid
Bug description:
Hi,
I've found that under certain circumstances cinder does not create
volumes fast enough.
I can launch an image from a new volume from image with 4GB. I use LVM
to allocate space. After a while I found that the instance didn't
worked.
Looking at logs I can find:
2014-01-23 21:44:15.337 2398 TRACE nova.compute.manager [instance: a0e35767-424e-434d-99b4-35e19422054f] attempts=attempts)
2014-01-23 21:44:15.337 2398 TRACE nova.compute.manager [instance: a0e35767-424e-434d-99b4-35e19422054f] VolumeNotCreated: Volume 137bc77b-c9e6-47ba-b2f
5-c83f440a988b did not finish being created even after we waited 66 seconds or 60 attempts.
I was looking around and the cinder was "downloading". I think it was taking the image from the image server and building the volume. I don't know why it took so long since installation is gigabit ethernet and even more, the image is in a instance launched on the cinder hardware machine. So it does not even any networking. All resolves internally.
Image is saucy (About 300MB).
The problem is that after a while volume creation finished and
instance failed. So I recereated instance and made it work from volume
with no problems.
How should I track where the processing slows down?
I know that iscsi attachment is slow. One of possible point of
faillure is when you have iscsi target that are in a machine that's
not reachable. This slows down the rest of processing but I'm not sure
if this is a point here.
Anyway. I'm sure hardware is not the best but pretty decent. Raid1
array with WD black label. Good sata controller and Intel gigabit
network cards. So disk should not be the problem. I'm thinking about
networking/config related problem.
But I'm lost on this.
Any help.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1272076/+subscriptions
References