yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Kevin Benton <1473965@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't think we need to make an API change for this. Unless I'm
misunderstanding, it's still doing what it's supposed to when port min
is 0, right?

** Changed in: neutron
       Status: New => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473965

Title:
  the port of scecurity group rule for TCP or UDP should not be 0

Status in neutron:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  for TCP or UDP protocol, 0 is a reserved port, but for neutron
  security group rule, if a rule with TCP protocol, and its port-range-
  min is 0, the port-range-max will be invalid, because for port-range-
  min being 0 means that it allow all package pass, so I think it should
  not create a rule with port-range-min being 0, if user want to allow
  all TCP/UDP package pass, he can create a security group rule with
  port-range-min and port-range-max being None.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1473965/+subscriptions