← Back to team overview

yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Bug 1474279] [NEW] FWaaS let connection opened if delete allow rule, beacuse of conntrack

 

Public bug reported:

Hi,

I've faced a problem with FWaaS plugin in Neutron (Juno).
The firewall works, but when I delete a rule from the policy, the
connection will still works because of conntrack... (I tried with ping,
and ssh)
It's okay, if the connection will kept alive, if it's really alive, (an
active SSH for example) but if I delete the ICMP rule, and stop pinging,
and restart pinging, the ping will still works...

If I go to my neutron server, and do a conntrack -F command on my
relevant qrouter, the firewall starts working based on the valid rules...

Are there any way, to configure the conntrack cleanup when FWaaS
configuration modified by user?

If not, can somebody help me, where to make changes on code, to run that
command in the proper namespace after the iptables rule-generation?


Regards,
 Peter

** Affects: neutron
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474279

Title:
  FWaaS let connection opened if delete allow rule, beacuse of conntrack

Status in neutron:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,

  I've faced a problem with FWaaS plugin in Neutron (Juno).
  The firewall works, but when I delete a rule from the policy, the
  connection will still works because of conntrack... (I tried with ping,
  and ssh)
  It's okay, if the connection will kept alive, if it's really alive, (an
  active SSH for example) but if I delete the ICMP rule, and stop pinging,
  and restart pinging, the ping will still works...

  If I go to my neutron server, and do a conntrack -F command on my
  relevant qrouter, the firewall starts working based on the valid rules...

  Are there any way, to configure the conntrack cleanup when FWaaS
  configuration modified by user?

  If not, can somebody help me, where to make changes on code, to run that
  command in the proper namespace after the iptables rule-generation?

  
  Regards,
   Peter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1474279/+subscriptions


Follow ups