← Back to team overview

yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Bug 1499864] Re: Fullstack infrastructure as a developer multi-node deployment tool

 

As discussed during the drivers meeting, if someone shows active
interest, we can revisit, otherwise out of scope for now.

** Changed in: neutron
       Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499864

Title:
  Fullstack infrastructure as a developer multi-node deployment tool

Status in neutron:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  The fullstack testing infrastructure today is used purely in a testing
  context. This RFE suggests that it could be useful to have fullstack
  support another use case, which is a quick deployment tool for
  developers that want to manually test something they're working on, or
  if they want to learn about Neutron or a specific feature.

  Neutron would expose a script that would accept a deployment topology document that will describe what is currently here:
  https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/tests/fullstack/test_l3_agent.py#L61

  For example, a .yaml file with:
  How many OVS, L3, DHCP agents
  Global configuration such as the segmentation type, l2pop={True,False}, OVS arp responder etc.

  The script would then deploy the requested topology and spit out a
  credentials file to interact with the API server, information about
  the agents it deployed (Their host names, state paths, path to
  configuration files etc), and perhaps also a plotnetcfg [1] output of
  the resulting deployment (An image that shows how the OVS bridges are
  connected, namespaces, what devices are connected to what bridges).

  After deployment is finished, the script would also allow the creation
  of fake VMs (Identical to the fake VMs we already create during
  fullstack testing). Reminder: These VMs are backed by a Neutron port,
  a namespace, and a device with the appropriate IP address connected to
  the correct bridge. They can sufficiently simulate VMs, and resources
  on external networks (To enable testing floating IPs and SNAT).

  So, for example:
  neutron-fullstack deploy dvr_ha_dhcp.yaml  # Spits out information about the topology

  source <credentials_file_output_from_deploy command>
  neutron net-create 1
  neutron net-create 2
  neutron-fullstack create_vm --net_id=1, --binding:host_id=xyz
  neutron-fullstack create_vm --net_id=2, --binding:host_id=abc
  neutron router-create, attach it to both networks
  Test ping from VM 1 to VM 2

  neutron-fullstack destroy # Possibly accepting a topology ID if we
  were to support deploying more than a single topology at any given
  time, I need to think about this further

  
  [1] https://github.com/jbenc/plotnetcfg

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1499864/+subscriptions


References