yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[zhaobo <zhaobo6@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

[Existing problem]
Now, fwaas just contain the 'shared' field, when it is True, it can be fetched by all tenants.  But there is more requirements now, the enterprise who have the strong fw(more legitimate fw-rules/policies) want to share / sell its fw service to some tenants through our cloud system. 

[Proposal]
Now neutron can not fulfill this task until import rbac policies in L release. I think we could base on the existing rbac policies  mechanism to extend more resources which may have this application scene.  We could control the fw shared like existing network shared or maybe more cover.

[What is the enhancement?]
Share FW more sophisticated  to other specified tenants

** Affects: neutron
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: zhaobo (zhaobo6)
         Status: New

** Changed in: neutron
     Assignee: (unassigned) => zhaobo (zhaobo6)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1524231

Title:
  [RFE]neutron fwaas should be support share fw to specify tenant

Status in neutron:
  New

Bug description:
  [Existing problem]
  Now, fwaas just contain the 'shared' field, when it is True, it can be fetched by all tenants.  But there is more requirements now, the enterprise who have the strong fw(more legitimate fw-rules/policies) want to share / sell its fw service to some tenants through our cloud system. 

  [Proposal]
  Now neutron can not fulfill this task until import rbac policies in L release. I think we could base on the existing rbac policies  mechanism to extend more resources which may have this application scene.  We could control the fw shared like existing network shared or maybe more cover.

  [What is the enhancement?]
  Share FW more sophisticated  to other specified tenants

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1524231/+subscriptions