yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #44708
[Bug 1534445] [NEW] Multiple floating IPs from the same external network are associated to one port when commands are executed at the same time
Public bug reported:
I have three controller nodes and the Neutron servers on these
controllers are set behind Pacemaker and HAProxy to realize
active/active HA using DevStack. MariaDB Galera cluster is used as my
database backend. I am using the latest codes.
If I have multiple commands to create floating IPs and associate them to
the same port at the same time, all of the commands would return success
and end up with multiple floating IPs from the same external network
associated to the same port.
How to reproduce:
Step 1: Create a network
$ neutron net-create net1
Step 2: Create a subnet on the network
$ neutron subnet-create --name subnet1 net1 192.168.100.0/24
Step 3: Create a port on the network
$ neutron port-create net1
Step 4: Create a router
$ neutron router-create router-floatingip-test
Step 5: Add the subnet as its interface
$ neutron router-interface-add router-floatingip-test subnet1
Step 5: Create an external network
$ neutron net-create ext-net --router:external True
Step 6: Add a subnet on the external network
$ neutron subnet-create --name ext-subnet ext-net 192.168.122.0/24
Step 7: Set the external network as the router's default gateway
$ neutron router-gateway-set router-floatingip-test ext-net
Step 8: Run the three commands at the same time to create floating IPs
On controller1:
$ neutron floatingip-create ext-net --port-id b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511
On controller2:
$ neutron floatingip-create ext-net --port-id b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511
On controller3:
$ neutron floatingip-create ext-net --port-id b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511
where, port_id b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511 is the port we
created in Step 3.
The result would be three floating IPs associated to the same port, as
shown in http://paste.openstack.org/show/483691/
The expected error message (say, we run the second command after the first one succeeds) would be
Cannot associate floating IP 192.168.122.20 (bd4d47a5-45c1-48e1-a48a-aef08039a955) with port b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511 using fixed IP 192.168.100.3, as that fixed IP already has a floating IP on external network 920ee0f3-3db8-4005-8d29-0be474947186.
Since one port with one fixed_ip is not allowed to have multiple floating IPs from the same external network.
In the above procedure, I set port_id when creating these three floating
IPs. Same bug occurred when I updated three existing floating IPs to be
associated with the same port at the same time.
I assume this bug happens because multiple APIs are executed
concurrently and the validation check on every API succeeds [1].
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/db/l3_db.py#L915
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Lujin Luo (luo-lujin)
Status: New
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lujin Luo (luo-lujin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534445
Title:
Multiple floating IPs from the same external network are associated to
one port when commands are executed at the same time
Status in neutron:
New
Bug description:
I have three controller nodes and the Neutron servers on these
controllers are set behind Pacemaker and HAProxy to realize
active/active HA using DevStack. MariaDB Galera cluster is used as my
database backend. I am using the latest codes.
If I have multiple commands to create floating IPs and associate them
to the same port at the same time, all of the commands would return
success and end up with multiple floating IPs from the same external
network associated to the same port.
How to reproduce:
Step 1: Create a network
$ neutron net-create net1
Step 2: Create a subnet on the network
$ neutron subnet-create --name subnet1 net1 192.168.100.0/24
Step 3: Create a port on the network
$ neutron port-create net1
Step 4: Create a router
$ neutron router-create router-floatingip-test
Step 5: Add the subnet as its interface
$ neutron router-interface-add router-floatingip-test subnet1
Step 5: Create an external network
$ neutron net-create ext-net --router:external True
Step 6: Add a subnet on the external network
$ neutron subnet-create --name ext-subnet ext-net 192.168.122.0/24
Step 7: Set the external network as the router's default gateway
$ neutron router-gateway-set router-floatingip-test ext-net
Step 8: Run the three commands at the same time to create floating IPs
On controller1:
$ neutron floatingip-create ext-net --port-id b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511
On controller2:
$ neutron floatingip-create ext-net --port-id b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511
On controller3:
$ neutron floatingip-create ext-net --port-id b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511
where, port_id b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511 is the port we
created in Step 3.
The result would be three floating IPs associated to the same port, as
shown in http://paste.openstack.org/show/483691/
The expected error message (say, we run the second command after the first one succeeds) would be
Cannot associate floating IP 192.168.122.20 (bd4d47a5-45c1-48e1-a48a-aef08039a955) with port b53d0826-53c4-427b-81b2-3ab6cb0f4511 using fixed IP 192.168.100.3, as that fixed IP already has a floating IP on external network 920ee0f3-3db8-4005-8d29-0be474947186.
Since one port with one fixed_ip is not allowed to have multiple floating IPs from the same external network.
In the above procedure, I set port_id when creating these three
floating IPs. Same bug occurred when I updated three existing floating
IPs to be associated with the same port at the same time.
I assume this bug happens because multiple APIs are executed
concurrently and the validation check on every API succeeds [1].
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/db/l3_db.py#L915
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1534445/+subscriptions
Follow ups