yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #55078
[Bug 1612896] Re: test_router_add_interface_port may fail due to extra port created
Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/355094
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron/commit/?id=fadee7a41e88c0081e2a92c4808e845d8ac5df8f
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: master
commit fadee7a41e88c0081e2a92c4808e845d8ac5df8f
Author: Shih-Hao Li <shihli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:35:50 2016 -0700
Fix potential problem in test_router_add_interface_port
test_router_add_interface_port may fail when an internal metadata
network is created during add_router_interface action.
The potential problem is introduced by Commit 6281fddbcb4c
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285048/)
which adds an additional update_port inside add_router_interface()
to update device_id and device_owner on the newly created router port.
The problem could happen when users attach a subnet (for example
10.0.0.0/24) to a router. During the add_router_interface action,
vendor's plugin may create an internal metadata subnet (such as
169.254.169.252/30) and attach it to the same router. Since two
router ports (10.0.0.1 and 169.254.169.253) are created during this
operation, the extra update_port was called on both router ports.
Before Commit 6281fddbcb4c, test_router_add_interface_port only saw
one update_port call on 10.0.0.1. After the change, it now sees three
update_port calls, two on 10.0.0.1 and one on 169.254.169.253.
Because it doesn't expect to see the update_port call on port
169.254.169.253 (which is the last update_port call),
the update_port.assert_called_with() fails.
This patch changes the assert method, so it will check if update_port
has been called on the main router port instead of checking the latest
update_port call is on the main router port.
Change-Id: I0ec1c90ee18bd9d0b027ad462cd6a3c6a079347f
Closes-Bug: #1612896
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612896
Title:
test_router_add_interface_port may fail due to extra port created
Status in neutron:
Fix Released
Bug description:
test_router_add_interface_port may fail when an internal metadata network is
created during add_router_interface action.
The potential problem is introduced by Commit 6281fddbcb4c
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285048/)
which adds an additional update_port inside add_router_interface()
to update device_id and device_owner on the newly created router port.
The problem could happen when users attach a subnet (for example 10.0.0.0/24)
to a router. During the add_router_interface action, vendor's plugin may
create an internal metadata subnet (such as 169.254.169.252/30) and attach
it to the same router. Since two router ports (10.0.0.1 and 169.254.169.253)
are created during this operation, the extra update_port was called for both
router ports.
Before Commit 6281fddbcb4c, test_router_add_interface_port only saw one
update_port call on 10.0.0.1. After the change, it now sees three
update_port calls, two on 10.0.0.1 and one on 169.254.169.253. Because it
doesn't expect to see the update_port call on port 169.254.169.253 (which is
the last update_port call), the update_port.assert_called_with() fails.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1612896/+subscriptions
References