yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #61024
[Bug 1251224] Re: ICMP security group rules should have a type and code params instead of using "--port-range-min" and "--port-range-max"
Moving to invalid/unassigned and will timeout in 60 days as-is.
If additional work is needed and in scope please reassign.
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: neutron
Importance: Medium => Undecided
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Anthony Chow (vcloudernbeer) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Invalid => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251224
Title:
ICMP security group rules should have a type and code params instead
of using "--port-range-min" and "--port-range-max"
Status in neutron:
Incomplete
Bug description:
Version
======
Havana on rhel
Description
=========
I couldn't find a doc specifying whether icmp security group rules ignore the "--port-range-min" and "--port-range-max" params or use then as code and type as we know from nova security group rules.
I think that it should be:
i. Well documented.
ii. prohibited for use of "--port-range-min" and "--port-range-max" in icmp rules context, new switches should be created for code and type.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1251224/+subscriptions