yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #62402
[Bug 1673818] [NEW] Misleading requirements for 'unpartitioned disks' for ConfigDrive in documentation
Public bug reported:
Current documentation states that:
http://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/datasources/configdrive.html#version-2
... a config drive: ...Must be a un-partitioned block device (/dev/vdb,
not /dev/vdb1)...
This is not correct.
1. Cloud-init actually, works with ConfigDrive as partition (e.g. /dev/sda1)
2. Ironic uses partition at the end of disk to write metadata, and it's absurd for baremetal provisioning to dedicate whole disk (actual SATA, SSD, SAS/FC drive) just to tiny metada.
3. According to @smoser at #cloud-init IRC, " i'm pretty sure the doc is just wrong, ... i'm pretty sure reading current code that if the filesystem has a label of 'config-2', then it will work".
I think this part of documentation should be rewritten to avoid
confusion with Ironic workflow for ConfigDrive.
** Affects: cloud-init
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
-
Current documentation states that:
http://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/datasources/configdrive.html#version-2
... a config drive: ...Must be a un-partitioned block device (/dev/vdb,
not /dev/vdb1)...
This is not correct.
- 1. Cloud-init actually, works with ConfigDrive as partition.
+ 1. Cloud-init actually, works with ConfigDrive as partition (e.g. /dev/sda1)
2. Ironic uses partition at the end of disk to write metadata, and it's absurd for baremetal provisioning to dedicate whole disk (actual SATA, SSD, SAS/FC drive) just to tiny metada.
3. According to @smoser at #cloud-init IRC, " i'm pretty sure the doc is just wrong, ... i'm pretty sure reading current code that if the filesystem has a label of 'config-2', then it will work".
I think this part of documentation should be rewritten to avoid
confusion with Ironic workflow for ConfigDrive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673818
Title:
Misleading requirements for 'unpartitioned disks' for ConfigDrive in
documentation
Status in cloud-init:
New
Bug description:
Current documentation states that:
http://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/datasources/configdrive.html#version-2
... a config drive: ...Must be a un-partitioned block device
(/dev/vdb, not /dev/vdb1)...
This is not correct.
1. Cloud-init actually, works with ConfigDrive as partition (e.g. /dev/sda1)
2. Ironic uses partition at the end of disk to write metadata, and it's absurd for baremetal provisioning to dedicate whole disk (actual SATA, SSD, SAS/FC drive) just to tiny metada.
3. According to @smoser at #cloud-init IRC, " i'm pretty sure the doc is just wrong, ... i'm pretty sure reading current code that if the filesystem has a label of 'config-2', then it will work".
I think this part of documentation should be rewritten to avoid
confusion with Ironic workflow for ConfigDrive.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1673818/+subscriptions
Follow ups