yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #63311
[Bug 1683256] [NEW] linuxbridge multinode depending on multicast support of provider
Public bug reported:
The way the Linux Bridge multinode job works right now, the VXLAN tenant
networks are not using l2_population and subsequently rely on the
multicast 'group' feature of kernel bridges for carrying broadcast
traffic.
This would not normally be a problem, however, the local interface they
are using to send this multicast traffic is the one attached directly to
the provider cloud's network. So we are ultimately at the mercy of the
provider's networks to carry multicast traffic between the multi-node
instances, which is just asking for failures.
We need to adjust the job to setup a tunnel between the multinode
instances to safely carry traffic between them like we do for DVR [1].
1. https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/devstack-gate/tree
/devstack-vm-gate.sh#n149
This is likely leading to the instability of the LB multi-node job when
the job is on certain cloud providers that might not have good multicast
routing.
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Critical
Status: New
** Tags: gate-failure
** Tags added: gate-failure
** Changed in: neutron
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Description changed:
The way the Linux Bridge multinode job works right now, the VXLAN tenant
networks are not using l2_population and subsequently rely on the
multicast 'group' feature of kernel bridges for carrying broadcast
traffic.
This would not normally be a problem, however, the local interface they
are using to send this multicast traffic is the one attached directly to
the provider cloud's network. So we are ultimately at the mercy of the
provider's networks to carry multicast traffic between the multi-node
instances, which is just asking for failures.
We need to adjust the job to setup a tunnel between the multinode
instances to safely carry traffic between them like we do for DVR [1].
- 1. http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/devstack-
- gate/tree/multinode_setup_info.txt
+ 1. https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/devstack-gate/tree
+ /devstack-vm-gate.sh#n149
-
- This is likely leading to the instability of the LB multi-node job when the job is on certain cloud providers that might not have good multicast routing.
+ This is likely leading to the instability of the LB multi-node job when
+ the job is on certain cloud providers that might not have good multicast
+ routing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683256
Title:
linuxbridge multinode depending on multicast support of provider
Status in neutron:
New
Bug description:
The way the Linux Bridge multinode job works right now, the VXLAN
tenant networks are not using l2_population and subsequently rely on
the multicast 'group' feature of kernel bridges for carrying broadcast
traffic.
This would not normally be a problem, however, the local interface
they are using to send this multicast traffic is the one attached
directly to the provider cloud's network. So we are ultimately at the
mercy of the provider's networks to carry multicast traffic between
the multi-node instances, which is just asking for failures.
We need to adjust the job to setup a tunnel between the multinode
instances to safely carry traffic between them like we do for DVR [1].
1. https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/devstack-gate/tree
/devstack-vm-gate.sh#n149
This is likely leading to the instability of the LB multi-node job
when the job is on certain cloud providers that might not have good
multicast routing.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1683256/+subscriptions
Follow ups