yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[OpenStack Infra <1637444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Reviewed:  https://review.openstack.org/404178
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/horizon/commit/?id=e9db12382e5cf3d231ab9a483ede0beb6546338a
Submitter: Zuul
Branch:    master

commit e9db12382e5cf3d231ab9a483ede0beb6546338a
Author: Kenji Ishii <ken-ishii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Mar 30 02:43:49 2017 +0000

    Support security groups association per port
    
    This patch support operation for operators and project users to
    associate security groups to a port. The feature is mentioned at
    the neutron user feedback session in Barcelona summit [1].
    
    This function UI is same as the function of security groups
    association per instance. To realize this, the way of implementation
    for 'Edit port' is changed, which move from a single modal to a
    workflow base.
    
    [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-neutron-end-user-operator-feedback (L.35+)
    
    Also we need to display how security groups is associated at a port.
    At the moment, there is not way to be able to see it (only this function).
    It should be done as an another patch.
    
    Change-Id: I96e0fafdffbf05b8167ec1b85f7430176fdaab90
    Closes-Bug: #1637444
    Co-Authored-By: Akihiro Motoki <amotoki@xxxxxxxxx>


** Changed in: horizon
       Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637444

Title:
  security group association per port is not supported

Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon):
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Horizon security group association interface only allows users to
  apply security groups with an instance (server). There is no way to
  apply security groups to a specific port.

  It is a usual use case where a server has multiple interfaces and each
  interface has a specific purpose (for example, one for internal
  connectivity and the other for external connectivity). In this case, a
  user wants to apply different security groups to different ports.

  It comes from the neutron user feedback session in Barcelona.
  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-neutron-end-user-operator-feedback (L.35+)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1637444/+subscriptions