yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[bjolo <bjorn.lofdahl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

hi,

Today neutron supports quota on floating IPs, but for private clouds the
use cases for shared provider networks are increasing. In this area
neutron offers no quota mechanism as far as i can tell, and it is quite
painful since we cannot prevent any project from consuming the whole
provider network. Ideally we would like to have a much more granular
quota system that can handle limits per network, not just a total
summary. Private clouds tend to have many external/shared networks in
different security zones in the enterprise.

- Floating IP quota per external network.
- IP/ports quota per shared provider network.

br,

bjolo

** Affects: neutron
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756270

Title:
  quota on shared provider networks

Status in neutron:
  New

Bug description:
  hi,

  Today neutron supports quota on floating IPs, but for private clouds
  the use cases for shared provider networks are increasing. In this
  area neutron offers no quota mechanism as far as i can tell, and it is
  quite painful since we cannot prevent any project from consuming the
  whole provider network. Ideally we would like to have a much more
  granular quota system that can handle limits per network, not just a
  total summary. Private clouds tend to have many external/shared
  networks in different security zones in the enterprise.

  - Floating IP quota per external network.
  - IP/ports quota per shared provider network.

  br,

  bjolo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1756270/+subscriptions