yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #71746
[Bug 1756465] [NEW] Need glance v2 way to register image by location
Public bug reported:
The release notes for Queens state "With the introduction of the web-
download import method, we consider the Image Service v2 API to have
reached feature parity with the DEPRECATED v1 API in all important
respects.", but v2 does NOT provide any way to register an image by
location.
Before v1 gets removed, there needs to be something similar to web-
download, but referencing the remote URL, rather than copying from it -
web-location?. This may be considered insecure on the internet, but for
a private cloud on a protected intranet, it's acceptable, and more
efficient when multiple glance instances need to make use of images that
are already published on an internal HTTP server.
See also bug 1750892, which could enable a workaround, but it's
cumbersome, and requires the location to be exposed, which could present
other security issues (even on an intranet).
** Affects: glance
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to Glance.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756465
Title:
Need glance v2 way to register image by location
Status in Glance:
New
Bug description:
The release notes for Queens state "With the introduction of the web-
download import method, we consider the Image Service v2 API to have
reached feature parity with the DEPRECATED v1 API in all important
respects.", but v2 does NOT provide any way to register an image by
location.
Before v1 gets removed, there needs to be something similar to web-
download, but referencing the remote URL, rather than copying from it
- web-location?. This may be considered insecure on the internet, but
for a private cloud on a protected intranet, it's acceptable, and more
efficient when multiple glance instances need to make use of images
that are already published on an internal HTTP server.
See also bug 1750892, which could enable a workaround, but it's
cumbersome, and requires the location to be exposed, which could
present other security issues (even on an intranet).
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1756465/+subscriptions
Follow ups