yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #73038
[Bug 1757482] Re: IP address for a router interface allowed outside the allocation range of subnet
[Expired for neutron because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1757482
Title:
IP address for a router interface allowed outside the allocation range
of subnet
Status in neutron:
Expired
Bug description:
Currently running Queens on Ubuntu 16.04 with the linuxbridge ml2
plugin with vxlan overlays. We have a single, large provider network
that we have set to 'shared' and 'external', so people who need to do
things that don't work well with NAT can connect their instances
directly to the provider network. Our 'allocation range' as defined
in our provider subnet is dedicated to tenants, so there should be no
conflicts.
One of our users connected a neutron router to the provider network
(not via the 'external network' option, but rather via the normal 'add
interface' option) and neglected to specify an IP address. The
neutron router decided that it was now the gateway for the entire
provider network and began arp'ing.
This seems like it should be disallowed inside of neutron (you
shouldn't be able to specify an IP address for a router interface that
isn't explicitly part of your allocation range on said subnet).
Unless neutron just expect issues like this to be handled by the
physical provider infrastructure (spoofing prevention, etc.)?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1757482/+subscriptions
References