yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #74147
[Bug 1667756] Re: Backup HA router sending traffic, traffic from switch interrupted
** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Also affects: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/mitaka
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: cloud-archive/mitaka
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: cloud-archive/mitaka
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: cloud-archive
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667756
Title:
Backup HA router sending traffic, traffic from switch interrupted
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
Invalid
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive mitaka series:
Triaged
Status in neutron:
Fix Released
Status in neutron package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in neutron source package in Xenial:
Triaged
Bug description:
As outlined in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142843/, backup HA
routers should not send any traffic. Any traffic will cause the
connected switch to learn a new port for the associated src mac
address since the mac address will be in use on the primary HA router.
We are observing backup routers sending IPv6 RA and RS messages
probably in response to incoming IPv6 RA messages. The subnets
associated with the HA routers are not intended for IPv6 traffic.
A typical traffic sequence is:
Packet from external switch...
08:81:f4:a6:dc:01 > 33:33:00:00:00:01, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 110: (hlim 255, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 56) fe80:52:0:136c::fe > ff02::1: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, router advertisement, length 56
Immediately followed by a packet from the backup HA router...
fa:16:3e:a7:ae:63 > 33:33:ff:a7:ae:63, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 86: (hlim 1, next-header Options (0) payload length: 32) :: > ff02::1:ffa7:ae63: HBH (rtalert: 0x0000) (padn) [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, multicast listener reportmax resp delay: 0 addr: ff02::1:ffa7:ae63
Another pkt...
fa:16:3e:a7:ae:63 > 33:33:ff:a7:ae:63, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 78: (hlim 255, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 24) :: > ff02::1:ffa7:ae63: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, length 24, who has 2620:52:0:136c:f816:3eff:fea7:ae63
Another Pkt...
fa:16:3e:a7:ae:63 > 33:33:00:00:00:01, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 86: (hlim 255, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 32)
At this point, the switch has updated its mac table and traffic to the
fa:16:3e:a7:ae:63 address has been redirected to the backup host.
SSH/ping traffic resumes at a later time when the primary router node
sends traffic with the fa:16:3e:a7:ae:63 source address.
This problem is reproducible in our environment as follows:
1. Deploy OSP10
2. Create external network
3. Create external subnet (IPv4)
4. Create an internal network and VM
5. Attach floating ip
6. ssh into the VM through the FIP or ping the FIP
7. you will start to see ssh freeze or the ping fail occasionally
Additional info:
Setting accept_ra=0 on the backup host routers stops the problem from
happening. Unfortunately, on a reboot, we loose the setting. The current
sysctl files have accept_ra=0.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1667756/+subscriptions
References