yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #77375
[Bug 1805891] Re: pci numa polices are not followed
Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/624444
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/commit/?id=59d94633518e6f6272e9f0654bb908e332f97a96
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: master
commit 59d94633518e6f6272e9f0654bb908e332f97a96
Author: Stephen Finucane <sfinucan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Dec 11 16:01:38 2018 +0000
objects: Store InstancePCIRequest.numa_policy in DB
In change I9360fe29908, we added the 'numa_policy' field to the
'InstancePCIRequest' object. Unfortunately we did not update the
(de)serialization logic for the 'InstancePCIRequests' object, meaning
this field was never saved to the database. As a result, claiming will
always fail [1].
The resolution is simple - add the (de)serialization logic and tests to
prevent regression.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/18.0.0/nova/compute/resource_tracker.py#L214-L215
Change-Id: Id4d8ecb8fee46b21590ebcc62a2850030cef6508
Closes-Bug: #1805891
** Changed in: nova
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805891
Title:
pci numa polices are not followed
Status in OpenStack Compute (nova):
Fix Released
Bug description:
Description
===========
https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/queens/implemented/share-pci-between-numa-nodes.html
introduced the concept of numa affinity policies for pci passthough devices.
upon testing it was observed that the prefer policy is broken.
for contested there is a sperate bug to track the lack of support for neutron sriov interfaces.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1795920 so the scope of this bug is limited
pci numa policies for passtrhough devices using a flavor alias.
background
----------
by default in nova pci devices are numa affinitesed using the legacy policy.
but you can override this behavior via the alias. when set to prefer nova
should fall back to no numa affintiy bwteen the guest and the pci devce
if a device on a local numa node is not availeble.
the policies are discibed below.
legacy
This is the default value and it describes the current nova
behavior. Usually we have information about association of PCI devices
with NUMA nodes. However, some PCI devices do not provide such
information. The legacy value will mean that nova will boot instances
with PCI device if either:
The PCI device is associated with at least one NUMA nodes on which the instance will be booted
There is no information about PCI-NUMA affinity available
preferred
This value will mean that nova-scheduler will choose a compute
host with minimal consideration for the NUMA affinity of PCI devices.
nova-compute will attempt a best effort selection of PCI devices based
on NUMA affinity, however, if this is not possible then nova-compute
will fall back to scheduling on a NUMA node that is not associated
with the PCI device.
Note that even though the NUMATopologyFilter will not consider
NUMA affinity, the weigher proposed in the Reserve NUMA Nodes with PCI
Devices Attached spec [2] can be used to maximize the chance that a
chosen host will have NUMA-affinitized PCI devices.
Steps to reproduce
==================
the test case was relitively simple
- deploy a singel node devstack install on a host with 2 numa nodes.
- enable the pci and numa topology fileters
- whitelist a pci device attach to numa_node 0
e.g. passthrough_whitelist = { "address": "0000:01:00.1" }
- adust the vcpu_pin_set to only list the cpus on numa_node 1
e.g. vcpu_pin_set=8-15
- crate an alias in the pci section of the nova.conf
alias = { "vendor_id":"8086", "product_id":"10c9", "device_type":"type-PF", "name":"nic-pf", "numa_policy": "preferred"}
- restart the nova services
sudo systemctl restart devstack@n-*
- update a flavour with the alias and a numa toplogy of 1
openstack flavour set --property pci_passthrough:alias='nic-pf:1' 42
openstack flavour set --property hw:numa_nodes=1 42
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
| OS-FLV-DISABLED:disabled | False |
| OS-FLV-EXT-DATA:ephemeral | 0 |
| access_project_ids | None |
| disk | 0 |
| id | 42 |
| name | m1.nano |
| os-flavor-access:is_public | True |
| properties | hw:numa_nodes='1', pci_passthrough:alias='nic-pf:1' |
| ram | 64 |
| rxtx_factor | 1.0 |
| swap | |
| vcpus | 1 |
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
boot a vm with the flavor
Expected result
===============
vm boots with cpus and ram from host numa node 1
and the pci devcie for host numa node 0
Actual result
=============
the resouce tracker failst to claim the pci device as it cannot
create a guest with a virtual numa topology of 1 with a pci device form a remote numa node.
i.e. there is no fall back and the vm fails to boot due to nova trying to enforce numa affinity.
Environment
===========
1. Exact version of OpenStack you are running.
master but i belive this will be broken on queens and rocky too.
2. Which hypervisor did you use?
libvirt kvm.
2. Which storage type did you use?
N/a cinder lvm and default libvirt image backend
3. Which networking type did you use?
N/A openvswitch.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1805891/+subscriptions
References